generation only now being compensated for some of those diseases - bronchitis and emphysema. Imagine what it must have been like to have had one of those men as a son, husband or father. Now, at the point when technology can prevent such destruction, that selfsame technology is being removed from the few remaining pits.
On the 20th anniversary of the start of the miners' strike three key points need to be understood. First, on energy policy: instead of being the only European Union country that is self-sufficient in energy and a net oil exporter, in a few years we will join the others in their energy dependency.
This time the UK will be at the end of the gas and oil pipelines from Russia, central Asia, Algeria and the Gulf. Windfarms, however welcome, will not save us.
Last year's energy white paper acknowledged this: "By 2020 we are likely to be importing around three-quarters of our energy needs. And by that time half the world's gas and oil will be coming from countries that are currently perceived as relatively unstable, either in political or economic terms." There are no major plans to build clean coal stations, but that is what Spencer Abraham, the US energy secretary, advised George Bush and Tony Blair in July 2003.
Second, the economic and social costs of destroying the British coal industry have been huge - at least £28bn. This is nearly half of the North Sea tax revenues of E6obn collected since 1985. Unless further support is forthcoming, the horrendous damage to mining communities will take at least two generations to heal, notwithstanding the work of the Coalfields Regeneration Trust and the Coalfield Communities Campaign.
Third, the miners' strike could not have taken shape in the way it did in any other EU country. It would have been negotiated to a settlement firmly within the restructuring aid framework of the European Coal and Steel Community treaty, the founding treaty of the European economic and social model. Instead, in Britain we had the application of 19th-century industrial relations to an industry that was at a technological watershed.
Arthur Scargill, the miners' leader, was right about two things in particular: the huge scale of the redundancy and closure programme, and the inability of the consultation procedures within the industry to handle the issue.
Restructuring had to be collectively bargained as well, but neither the National Coal Board (NCB) nor the government wanted to negotiate the substantive issues.
Scargill was right by instinct, but also because a group of us from Bradford
University had done the research. In 1982 we showed the National Union of Mineworkers executive that automated, heavy-duty technology would produce a productivity explosion. If the market for coal remained the same, this would lead in the worst case to the loss of more than 165,000 jobs, or 74% of the 1981 pit workforce of 225,000. The first to go would be the coalfields of Scotland, the north-east, Kent and south Wales, which had received little investment. As Nelson Mandela observed with his customary frankness at an international mineworkers' conference in Johannesburg in
1992: "Scargill and the NUM have been vilified for trying to defend their members."
At the famous meeting of March 6 1984, James Cowan, NCB deputy chairman, admitted only reluctantly that around 20 pits and 21,000 jobs would be hit. Scargill's initial figure of 70,000 job losses was attacked as scaremongering. Only in her 1993 memoirs could Mrs Thatcher admit the truth. lan MacGregor, NCB chairman, had told her in September 1983 that he wanted to cut 64,000 jobs in three years and extend the redundancy scheme to include miners under 50.
The huge hi-tech Selby coalfield is due to close by June this year. Then there will be fewer than 5,000 miners working in Britain's pits. While the second phase of pit closures arose in the 1990s from market displacement - mainly by the new, privatised gas power stations - the majority of job losses had earlier flowed from the productivity revolution. To illustrate this point: just one hi-tech coalface, at Kellingley colliery in Yorkshire, was producing 42,000 tonnes a week in 2003, almost as much as the 46,000 tonnes a week the whole pit was producing in 1983 from six faces, with six times as many men.
Many have argued that the miners' strike could have been settled well before that terrible year had run its course. This was made immensely difficult because the NCB would not negotiate. True, the NUM was forced into tactical options that made matters worse. And a civil war fought against the mining communities generated such pressure that an internal civil war broke out inside the union, at a time when members in the Midlands did not understand that their jobs were at risk.
There was always another way. The union had tabled a draft technology agreement in 1983. The NCB rejected it as "inappropriate". When NUM negotiators raised this in 1984 they were accused of moving the goalposts. A new technology agreement would have cut working hours and allowed older men to leave, to be replaced by their unemployed sons. Anywhere else in Europe it would have been seized upon as a basis for settlement. The October
1984 agreement with the pit deputies' union, Nacods, added an independent review body to the colliery review procedure. But it dealt with consequences, not causes, and was not binding.
Britain suffered a needless civil war and the mining communities were destroyed. Many thousands of managers and breakaway UDM members lost their jobs. And now the country is about to lose one of its founding industries, just as it is on the point of being modernised.
Dave Feickert was the research officer for the National Union of Mine Workers from 1982 and 1984 agreement with the pit deputies' union, Nacods, added an independent review body to the colliery review procedure. But it dealt with consequences, not causes, and was not binding.
Britain suffered a needless civil war and the mining communities were destroyed. Many thousands of managers and breakaway UDM members lost their jobs. And now the country is about to lose one of its founding industries, just as it is on the point of being modernised.
• Dave Feickert was the TUC's Brussels officer from 1993-2003, and NUM national research officer from 1983-93
The 1984/1985 miners’ strike.
Arthur Scargill writes: Dave Feickartmaccompanied me to my visit to South Africa in 1992 and was at an event where he heard Nelson Mandela describe me as a hero. The fact that Dave stated in the Guardian that Thatcher admitted the truth in her memoirs is clear evidence that the NUM was not simply in conflict with the NCB and proves that the longest strike in British history was with the Tory government and Thatcher. She is on record saying that there must never again be a battle like that at Saltley Gate in Birmingham in 1972. It demonstrates the Tory government’s determination to crush the trade unions. This was not understood by the right wing trade union movement, with exceptions such as the rail union, the Seamen’s union and many smaller unions.
The real victory in 1984/5 was the struggle by the miners, the wonderful women against the closures and the backing that the NUM had from the public, which was stronger at the end of the strike then at the start one year earlier.
Socialist Labour Party 25/03/2025
댓글